The Ultimate Guide to Hip Osteoarthritis Treatment

The Silent Struggle: When Hip Pain Steals Your Life

Marcus loved golf. For thirty years, it was his weekend ritual—eighteen holes, good friends, and the satisfaction of a well-executed swing. But somewhere in his mid-sixties, something shifted. A dull ache began in his groin that gradually worsened. Walking the course became painful. Sitting in the car hurt. Eventually, even standing was uncomfortable.

What puzzled Marcus most was that the pain didn’t feel like it came from the back of his hip. It came from deep inside, from somewhere near his groin. He’d had knee problems before—this felt completely different. His primary care doctor examined him, ordered an X-ray, and delivered the diagnosis: hip osteoarthritis.

Hip osteoarthritis affects nearly 5 million Americans, yet many don’t realize they have it. Unlike knee pain, which people often blame on aging or overuse, hip pain is frequently attributed to back problems, groin injuries, or sciatica. This misdiagnosis often delays appropriate treatment by months or years. But hip osteoarthritis is highly treatable, and modern surgical options can restore function and return patients to activities they thought were gone forever.

Understanding your hip, how arthritis affects it, and what treatment options exist is the key to reclaiming mobility and comfort.

What Is Hip Osteoarthritis: Understanding the Hip Joint

The hip is a ball-and-socket joint, fundamentally different in design from the knee. This anatomy is crucial to understanding both how hip arthritis develops and why certain treatments are so effective.

The Silent Struggle: When Hip Pain Steals Your Life

Marcus loved golf. For thirty years, it was his weekend ritual—eighteen holes, good friends, and the satisfaction of a well-executed swing. But somewhere in his mid-sixties, something shifted. A dull ache began in his groin that gradually worsened. Walking the course became painful. Sitting in the car hurt. Eventually, even standing was uncomfortable.

What puzzled Marcus most was that the pain didn’t feel like it came from the back of his hip. It came from deep inside, from somewhere near his groin. He’d had knee problems before—this felt completely different. His primary care doctor examined him, ordered an X-ray, and delivered the diagnosis: hip osteoarthritis.

Hip osteoarthritis affects nearly 5 million Americans, yet many don’t realize they have it. Unlike knee pain, which people often blame on aging or overuse, hip pain is frequently attributed to back problems, groin injuries, or sciatica. This misdiagnosis often delays appropriate treatment by months or years. But hip osteoarthritis is highly treatable, and modern surgical options can restore function and return patients to activities they thought were gone forever.

Understanding your hip, how arthritis affects it, and what treatment options exist is the key to reclaiming mobility and comfort.

---

What Is Hip Osteoarthritis: Understanding the Hip Joint

The hip is a ball-and-socket joint, fundamentally different in design from the knee. This anatomy is crucial to understanding both how hip arthritis develops and why certain treatments are so effective.

Hip Joint Anatomy

The hip consists of:

• Femoral head: The rounded ball at the top of the thighbone (femur)

• Acetabulum: The cup-shaped socket in the pelvis that receives the femoral head

• Cartilage: Smooth hyaline cartilage covers both the femoral head and acetabulum, allowing frictionless motion

• Labrum: A cartilage ring around the acetabular rim that deepens the socket and distributes forces

• Ligaments: Strong capsular ligaments stabilize the joint

• Synovial fluid: This lubricating fluid nourishes the cartilage and reduces friction

The hip is the body’s largest weight-bearing joint and one of the most stable joints due to its deep socket design.

How Osteoarthritis Develops

Hip osteoarthritis develops when the protective cartilage breaks down due to aging, genetic predisposition, previous injury, or biomechanical stress. The process unfolds predictably:

1. Initial phase: Cartilage surface begins to thin and crack

2. Progressive phase: Cartilage loss accelerates; bone begins to remodel

3. Advanced phase: Substantial cartilage loss; bone spurs form; joint space narrows

Risk factors for hip osteoarthritis include:

• Age: Most common after age 50, though can occur earlier

• Gender: Slightly more common in men

• Genetics: Family history increases risk

• Previous injury: Femoral neck fractures, hip dislocation, or labral tears significantly increase risk

• Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI): Anatomical variation where bones pinch the cartilage during motion

• Hip dysplasia: Shallow hip socket (genetic or developmental)

• Obesity: Weight increases load on the joint

• Repetitive stress: Professional athletes or manual laborers at higher risk

---

Symptoms: Recognizing Hip Osteoarthritis

Hip osteoarthritis typically presents with a distinctive pattern that differs from other hip problems.

Classic Pain Characteristics

The pain of hip osteoarthritis has specific features:

• Location: Groin pain is the hallmark, though pain may radiate to the anterior (front) thigh, knee, or buttock

• Onset: Usually gradual, worsening over months to years

• Character: Dull ache, often described as “deep” pain from within the joint

• Activity relationship: Worsens with activity, particularly prolonged standing, walking, or transitions (sitting to standing)

• Morning stiffness: Often prominent, lasting 30 minutes to several hours

• Giving way: Sensation of hip instability or sudden weakness

• Clicking or catching: Irregular sensations with certain movements

Functional Limitations

Hip osteoarthritis progressively restricts activities:

• Gait impairment: Antalgic limp; shortened stride; pain with walking (may severely limit walking distance)

• Stair climbing: Difficulty ascending stairs, particularly leading with the affected leg

• Car transfers: Getting in and out of cars becomes progressively difficult and painful

• Dressing: Putting on shoes, socks, or pants requires significant hip flexion, which becomes painful

• Sexual function: May become limited or impossible

• Sports and recreation: Golf, tennis, hiking, and similar activities become impossible

• Sleep disturbance: Pain when lying on the affected side prevents comfortable sleep

• Psychological impact: Progressive functional loss leads to frustration, anxiety about disability, and social isolation

Physical Examination Findings

Dr. Ramkumar typically observes:

• Reduced range of motion: Especially hip flexion, internal rotation, and adduction

• Positive FABER test: Pain with hip flexion, abduction, external rotation (provocative test)

• Positive FADIR test: Pain with hip flexion, adduction, internal rotation

• Antalgic gait: Shortened stance on the affected side

• Hip flexion contracture: Inability to fully extend the hip

• Limb length discrepancy: Apparent when lying flat due to hip flexion contracture

• Muscle atrophy: Quadriceps and gluteal weakness from disuse

---

Diagnosis: Confirming Hip Osteoarthritis

Hip osteoarthritis diagnosis combines clinical assessment with imaging to confirm the diagnosis and assess severity.

Clinical History and Examination

Understanding the onset, progression, and character of symptoms guides the clinical diagnosis. The examination includes:

• Range of motion testing: Comparing affected and unaffected hips

• Specialized tests: FABER, FADIR, log roll test (internal/external rotation), and other provocative tests

• Gait analysis: Observing walking pattern and identifying antalgic gait

• Palpation: Assessing for effusion, warmth, or specific tender points

Imaging Studies

Pelvic X-rays are the first-line imaging:

• Anterior-posterior (AP) pelvic view: Shows overall hip anatomy and alignment

• Frog-leg lateral view: Best view for assessing femoral head cartilage loss and joint space narrowing

• False-profile view: Assesses the anterior and posterior margins of the acetabulum

X-ray findings in hip osteoarthritis include:

• Joint space narrowing (cartilage loss)

• Osteophytes (bone spurs)

• Sclerosis (bone hardening)

• Femoral head flattening or deformity

• Acetabular changes

X-rays correlate with symptom severity and guide treatment decisions.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) provides detailed soft tissue assessment:

• Cartilage thickness and integrity

• Labral pathology (tears or degeneration)

• Bone marrow lesions

• Synovitis (joint lining inflammation)

• Femoroacetabular impingement (anatomical factors)

MRI is particularly valuable for evaluating younger patients with early disease, assessing concurrent labral pathology, and determining if arthroscopic intervention might be beneficial.

Computed Tomography (CT) occasionally provides additional information about bone anatomy and is useful for preoperative surgical planning, particularly for hip replacement positioning.

---

Treatment Options: A Progression from Conservative to Surgical

Hip osteoarthritis treatment follows a well-established progression, beginning conservatively and advancing only when necessary.

Conservative Treatment: The Foundation

Physical Therapy

PT remains the cornerstone. Effective programs focus on:

• Hip strengthening: Gluteus medius, maximus, and hip rotator strengthening to stabilize the joint and improve biomechanics

• Core strengthening: Abdominal and back strengthening for improved pelvic stability

• Flexibility: Hip flexor stretching (the iliopsoas is often tight in hip OA), hamstring stretching, and hip abductor/adductor flexibility

• Gait training: Correcting antalgic limp and improving walking mechanics

• Low-impact cardiovascular exercise: Swimming, cycling, or water aerobics to maintain fitness without joint stress

• Functional training: Stairs, car transfers, and activities specific to each patient’s needs

Most effective programs involve 2-3 sessions weekly for 6-12 weeks, followed by a home maintenance program.

Activity Modification

• Positional awareness: Avoid hip flexion beyond 90 degrees (sitting in low chairs), hip adduction (crossing legs), and hip internal rotation

• Activity selection: Avoid high-impact activities (running, jumping) and repetitive rotational activities

• Environmental modifications: Higher toilet seats and chairs, sleeping with pillow between legs for side-lying comfort

• Assistive devices: Cane or walker to reduce hip load

Medications

• NSAIDs: Ibuprofen, naproxen, or prescription NSAIDs reduce pain and inflammation

• Topical NSAIDs: Applied directly over the hip

• Acetaminophen: Alternative for NSAID-intolerant patients

• Prescription medications: Duloxetine or other agents for chronic pain management

Weight Management

Hip arthritis improves dramatically with weight loss. Every pound of body weight adds 3-6 pounds of load across the hip. Even 10% weight loss produces measurable benefit.

Intermediate Interventions: Injection Therapy

Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections

Ultrasound or fluoroscopy-guided injection of corticosteroid into the hip joint reduces inflammation and provides pain relief lasting weeks to months. These injections are particularly valuable for:

• Bridging to PT when pain is too severe for exercise

• Providing temporary relief while conservative measures take effect

• Managing flare-ups of pain

Most insurance plans cover 2-4 injections yearly.

Viscosupplementation

Hyaluronic acid injections into the hip joint are less established than for the knee, but increasingly used with some evidence of benefit, particularly for early-stage osteoarthritis.

Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)

PRP injection into the hip may reduce inflammation and promote cartilage protection. Evidence is evolving, but some patients report significant benefit, particularly for early-stage disease. PRP is typically out-of-pocket ($1,500-3,000).

Surgical Interventions: Restoring Function

Hip Arthroscopy

Hip arthroscopy involves inserting a small camera and instruments into the hip joint through small incisions. This technique is particularly valuable for younger patients with early osteoarthritis and specific structural pathology:

• Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI): Arthroscopic correction of impingement can halt disease progression and provide pain relief

• Labral tear repair: Hip arthroscopy can repair torn labra, improving joint stability and reducing pain

• Cartilage damage: Limited debridement of damaged cartilage

• Synovitis: Removal of inflamed synovial tissue

Success rates for arthroscopy in appropriate candidates exceed 70-80%. Recovery is faster than major surgery, with return to activity in 4-8 weeks typically.

Hip Resurfacing

Hip resurfacing is a joint-preserving option particularly suited for younger, active patients with good bone quality. Rather than replacing the entire hip, resurfacing involves:

• Removing only the damaged cartilage from the femoral head and acetabulum

• Capping the femoral head with a metal prosthesis

• Placing a metal acetabular cup

Advantages include:

• Preserves bone (less bone removal than total replacement)

• Better hip biomechanics than total replacement

• Excellent functional outcomes in appropriate candidates

• Higher hip range of motion than total replacement

Disadvantages include:

• Less durable than total replacement (some devices have higher failure rates)

• Risk of metal ion elevation with some designs

• Requires excellent bone quality

• Longer operative time

• More specialized expertise required

Dr. Ramkumar notes: “Hip resurfacing offers younger patients a bone-preserving option that can restore excellent function. Careful patient selection is crucial for success.”

Anterior Hip Replacement

The anterior (front) approach to total hip replacement represents a significant advance in modern orthopedic surgery. Rather than accessing the hip through the posterior or lateral side, the anterior approach enters between the hip flexor muscles, preserving major muscle attachments.

Advantages of the anterior approach:

• Preserves hip abductor muscles (gluteus medius and minimus)

• Reduced hip dislocation rate (0.5-1% versus 2-5% with posterior approach)

• Better hip stability post-operatively

• Less postoperative hip precautions required

• Faster recovery in some metrics

• Better hip mechanics and strength preservation

The procedure:

1. Surgeon makes a small incision (3-4 inches) in the groin between hip flexor muscles

2. Damaged cartilage and bone are removed

3. Prosthetic components (femoral stem, femoral head, acetabular cup) are implanted

4. Modern implants are fixed with bone cement or may be cementless

Modern anterior hip replacement prostheses last 15-20+ years in most patients, with excellent functional outcomes and high patient satisfaction.

Total Hip Replacement: The Gold Standard

Total hip replacement (total hip arthroplasty) is the most effective treatment for advanced hip osteoarthritis. The procedure involves replacing both the femoral side (femoral stem and head) and acetabular side of the joint with prosthetic components.

A modern hip prosthesis consists of:

• Femoral stem: Inserted into the femur, typically 4-6 inches long

• Femoral head: Ball prosthesis that articulates with the cup (typically 28-36mm diameter)

• Acetabular cup: Prosthetic socket in the pelvis

• Bearing surface: Modern combinations include metal-on-plastic, ceramic-on-plastic, metal-on-metal, or ceramic-on-ceramic

The choice of bearing surface influences longevity and wear characteristics.

Surgical approaches to total hip replacement include:

• Anterior approach: Increasingly popular; best for young, active patients

• Lateral approach: Traditional approach; still widely used

• Posterior approach: Less common in modern practice

Outcomes of total hip replacement:

• Pain relief: >95% of patients achieve significant pain reduction

• Function: Excellent restoration of hip motion and strength

• Longevity: 90% of modern hip replacements survive 20 years without revision

• Complication rate: Low overall (serious complications occur in 1-3%)

• Return to activity: Most patients return to normal walking, stairs, and gentle sports

Recovery timeline:

• Weeks 0-2: Pain control, gentle motion, walking with assistive device

• Weeks 2-8: Progressive strengthening, weaning from assistive devices

• Weeks 8-12: Return to normal activities for most patients

• 3-6 months: Final outcomes apparent

---

Surgical Decision Framework

| Disease Stage | Imaging Findings | Conservative Therapy | Injection Therapy | Surgical Consideration |

|—|—|—|—|—|

| Early (joint space normal-slight narrowing) | Minimal osteophytes; normal-mild cartilage loss | Strongly recommended; often sufficient | Helpful if flare-ups occur | Arthroscopy if FAI or labral tear; otherwise defer |

| Moderate (definite joint space narrowing) | Moderate osteophytes; moderate cartilage loss | Recommended; variable effectiveness | Recommended as primary intermediate therapy | Consider if conservative fails after 3-6 months |

| Advanced (severe narrowing) | Severe osteophytes; severe cartilage loss | Limited effectiveness; supportive role | Temporary bridging only | Usually indicated; excellent outcomes expected |

| Severe with major functional loss | Near bone-on-bone; significant deformity | Supportive care only | Minimal benefit | Strongly indicated; dramatic functional restoration likely |

Consider surgery when:

• Conservative and injection therapy provide inadequate relief after 3-6 months

• Pain significantly impacts sleep, daily activities, or work

• Imaging shows advanced disease

• You understand risks and have realistic expectations

• You’re willing to commit to postoperative PT

---

Benefits and Risks of Treatment

Conservative Treatment

Benefits:

• Non-invasive; no surgical risks

• Can be sustained indefinitely

• Improves overall health

• May prevent or delay surgery

Risks:

• Slower symptom improvement

• Requires sustained adherence

• May not provide sufficient relief

• Disease may progress

Injections

Benefits:

• Office-based procedure

• Rapid symptom relief

• Can be repeated

• Preserves surgical options

• Extends interval before surgery

Risks:

• Temporary relief (not permanent)

• Variable efficacy

• Rare: infection or allergic reaction

• Cost (especially PRP)

Hip Arthroscopy

Benefits:

• Minimally invasive; small incisions

• Faster recovery than open surgery

• Can address specific mechanical problems

• Preserves surgical options

Risks:

• Infection (rare, <1%)

• Nerve/vessel injury (rare)

• Limited effectiveness for advanced osteoarthritis

• Anesthesia risks

Hip Resurfacing

Benefits:

• Preserves bone; less invasive than total replacement

• Better hip biomechanics

• Excellent functional outcomes

• Longer lifespan than traditional hip replacement in some systems

Risks:

• Requires excellent bone quality

• Higher complications in some patient groups

• Metal ion elevation possible (controversial clinical significance)

• Less long-term data than traditional replacement

• Revision surgery more complex

• Infection (1-2%)

• Blood clots (0.5-2%)

• Hip dislocation (1-2%)

• Anesthesia complications

Anterior Total Hip Replacement

Benefits:

• Excellent pain relief (>95%)

• Preserves hip abductor muscles

• Reduced dislocation risk

• Faster recovery compared to other approaches

• Superior hip mechanics

• Durable; 20+ year lifespan

• High patient satisfaction (85-90%)

Risks:

• Infection (1-2%)

• Blood clots (0.5-2%)

• Hip dislocation (0.5-1% with anterior, though higher with posterior approach)

• Prosthesis loosening or wear

• Groin/thigh pain from surgical approach (1-5%)

• Nerve injury (very rare)

• Limb length discrepancy (usually minor)

• Need for revision (10-15% at 15-20 years)

---

Why Patients Choose Commons Clinic for Hip Osteoarthritis

About Dr. Prem N. Ramkumar, MD, MBA

Dr. Ramkumar is a fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon with specialized expertise in hip and knee reconstruction. His training at Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital—two of the nation’s leading academic medical centers—exposed him to the most advanced surgical techniques and evidence-based approaches. His MBA provides unique insight into cost-effective care and health economics, allowing transparent discussions about treatment value.

His clinical practice emphasizes patient-centered decision-making: matching the right treatment to the right patient, explaining options clearly, and achieving outstanding functional outcomes.

Commons Clinic Advantages

Anterior Hip Replacement Expertise

Commons Clinic offers specialized anterior approach hip replacement, which offers superior outcomes compared to traditional approaches, particularly for active patients seeking to maintain hip function and return to sports and recreation.

Comprehensive Treatment Continuum

From conservative PT to injections to arthroscopy to sophisticated surgical reconstruction, Commons Clinic provides the full spectrum of hip osteoarthritis treatment. This allows seamless progression as your condition evolves.

Robotic-Assisted Surgery Capability

For total hip replacement, robotic-assisted surgery offers enhanced precision in component placement, leading to improved hip biomechanics, reduced complications, and superior long-term outcomes.

Extended Consultation Time

Dr. Ramkumar allocates extensive time for consultation, ensuring thorough discussion of your condition, preferences, and concerns without feeling rushed.

Financial Transparency

Commons Clinic partners with benefit plans offering:

• Carrum: $0 out-of-pocket for eligible procedures

• Transcarent: Transparent pricing

• LanternCare: Fixed surgical benefits

Broad Insurance Acceptance

• Aetna

• Cigna

• Anthem Blue Cross

• Blue Shield of California

• United Healthcare

Care Guarantee

Two-year warranty covering full cost of professional follow-up care, demonstrating confidence in outcomes and protecting you from unexpected expenses.

Convenient Locations

Santa Monica, Marina del Rey, Beverly Hills, Long Beach, and Lakewood clinics, plus nationwide virtual consultations.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is hip osteoarthritis different from knee osteoarthritis?

A: Yes, significantly. The hip is a ball-and-socket joint (versus the knee’s hinge joint), which affects how arthritis develops and how we treat it. Hip pain often presents as groin pain, whereas knee pain is typically anterior (front) knee pain. Treatment approaches differ as well.

Q: Can hip osteoarthritis be prevented?

A: Partially. Maintaining healthy weight, avoiding repetitive high-impact activities, and addressing hip impingement early if present may slow progression. However, genetic predisposition plays a significant role. If you have family history, be alert to early symptoms.

Q: Will hip osteoarthritis get worse?

A: It typically progresses gradually, though rate varies tremendously. Some patients remain stable for years; others progress more quickly. Conservative treatment may slow progression. Surgery doesn’t cure osteoarthritis but effectively manages symptoms and function.

Q: How long does hip replacement last?

A: Modern hip replacements typically last 15-20+ years. Advances in bearing surfaces and surgical technique have dramatically extended prosthesis lifespan compared to older generations. Most patients won’t outlive their first hip replacement.

Q: Can I return to sports after hip replacement?

A: Most patients can return to low-impact activities: walking, cycling, swimming, golf, hiking. High-impact activities (running, basketball, tennis) are generally not recommended, though some patients do them without complication. This is an important discussion to have with your surgeon during planning.

Q: How painful is hip replacement recovery?

A: Pain is usually moderate and well-controlled with medications. Most patients transition from opioid pain medication to over-the-counter pain relievers within 2-4 weeks. Physical therapy during recovery is important and usually manageable.

Q: What’s the difference between the anterior approach and traditional hip replacement?

A: The anterior approach accesses the hip from the front, between muscles, preserving major stabilizing muscles. This offers advantages: reduced dislocation risk, better hip strength, faster recovery, and superior long-term hip biomechanics. It does require specialized surgical expertise.

---

Key Takeaways

• Hip osteoarthritis is common but often misdiagnosed. The characteristic groin pain is frequently attributed to other causes, delaying appropriate treatment.

• Conservative therapy should always be attempted first. PT, weight management, and activity modification effectively manage many cases, particularly early disease.

• Progressive treatment options exist. Injections offer intermediate relief. Surgery is reserved for when conservative therapy fails.

• Anterior hip replacement offers superior outcomes. Preserving hip muscles provides better strength, stability, and long-term function.

• Modern hip replacements last 15-20+ years. Advanced bearing surfaces and surgical techniques have dramatically extended prosthesis durability.

• Dr. Ramkumar provides specialized expertise. His fellowship training and patient-centered approach ensure optimal treatment matched to your specific situation.

---

Call to Action

If you’re experiencing hip pain limiting your activities, reach out for a comprehensive evaluation. Dr. Ramkumar can clarify your condition and outline a personalized treatment plan.

Contact Commons Clinic:

• Phone: (310) 437-7921

• Email: hello@commonsclinic.com

• Virtual consultations available nationwide

Clinic locations in Santa Monica, Marina del Rey, Beverly Hills, Long Beach, and Lakewood.

---

Sources

Beaulé, P. E., Lee, J. L., Le Duff, M. J., Amstutz, H. C., & Ebramzadeh, E. (2006). Quantitative morphology of the proximal femur: Association with osteoarthritis development. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 88(Suppl 4), 106-116.

Beck, M., Kalhor, M., Leunig, M., & Ganz, R. (2005). Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage in end-stage osteoarthritis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 87(5), 1012-1018.

Charnley, J. (1972). The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 54(1), 61-76.

DeGroot, H., Pizzutillo, P. D., Herrera-Soto, J. A., et al. (2016). Evidence-based orthopedic surgery: What’s the best evidence? Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 14(3), 191-201.

Felson, D. T., Zhang, Y., Hannan, M. T., et al. (1997). Risk factors for incident radiographic knee osteoarthritis in the elderly: the Framingham Heart Study. Journal of Rheumatology, 24(4), 632-635.

Ganz, R., Parvizi, J., Beck, M., Leunig, M., Notzli, H., & Siebenrock, K. A. (2003). Femoroacetabular impingement: A cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, (417), 112-120.

Learmonth, I. D., Young, C., & Rorabeck, C. (2007). The operation of the century: Total hip replacement. The Lancet, 370(9597), 1508-1519.

Maheshwari, A. V., Taneja, A., & Rajnish, R. K. (2009). Femoroacetabular impingement: Diagnosis and management. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 43(1), 19-28.

Matassi, F., Nistri, L., Chimenti, M., Innocenti, M., & Rossi, F. (2014). Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with severe osteoporosis. International Journal of Surgery, 12(Suppl 1), S71-S74.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2014). Osteoarthritis: care and management in adults. Clinical Guideline 177.

Pandey, R., & Dolan, S. (2015). Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: A systematic review of outcome studies. International Orthopaedics, 39(12), 2389-2398.

Ritter, M. A., Harty, L. D., Davis, K. E., et al. (2003). Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 85(7), 1278-1285.

Singh, G. D., Athreya, K. A., Fries, J. F., et al. (1996). Mortality in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 39(10), 1823-1832.

Steppacher, S. D., Tannast, M., Ganz, R., & Siebenrock, K. A. (2008). Mean 20-year follow-up of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 466(7), 1633-1644.

Trojani, C., Drouwen, B., Sappey-Marinier, E., et al. (2003). Osteoarthritis of the hip: arthroscopic assessment. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 62(Suppl 2), ii27-ii32.